|
GRAVITY Gravity has been a large mystery for science and although we understand most of how it works there have been indications for a long time now that maybe we don't really understand it as well as we thought we did. Maybe someday we can fully grasp all the nuances of how it works and maybe even why. But that is what makes gravity so mysterious we don't really know what it is and we don't really know how or why it works. What is gravity, really ? There are a few different ways to think about what gravity might be. One is that it could be a resistance to acceleration. Inside our Post we see gravity behaves like a resistance to acceleration and so if our entire pocket of space time is accelerating then some resistance to that acceleration could be gravity. Or gravity could be form a electromagnetic attraction expressible in terms of the strong nuclear force and we may not be very far away from seeing the known forces drop down to two, the electroweak and the gravistrong. Using a mathematical principle called the double copy there has been promising work linking gravity to the strong nuclear force. Anyone can clearly see that Gravity and electrostatic attraction share nearly the same formula which leads one to wonder if we can express gravity in terms of electrostatic attraction and the answer I think would be an obvious yes. With a minor conversion factor between constants we can express either in terms of the other and there is now a possibility of defining a relationship between the strong nuclear force and gravity so we may be inching closer to seeing a unification of the four basic forces in our lifetime. If we figure out how either mass energy density or mass energy time density impacts aggregate gravitational attraction I think we will see gravity and the nuclear forces all in terms of electromagnetism. I've already explained how I see gravity being able to grow stronger the denser the mass energy that is giving off the tensor mesh in spheres of influence that interact in-phase because objects that share the same post will see their gravitational waves are in phase and they produce a stronger amount of displacement from the equilibrium of spacetime then just the individual objects themselves. I've listed a possible experiment similar to the moons in Bootes void analogy and that may prove the aggregate nature of gravity and help determine how to turn our gravitational constant into a gravitational function. (sidenote, many constants are functions and take on different values under different scenarios. Here is one possible experiment to try to better see how gravity works. ( how to produce the scenario that we could conduct this test inside of I have no idea but if it could be done I see lots of value in being able to measure the impact of mass energy density on gravity. Take two objects in a vacuum where mass of object A plus mass of object B = 100. B is three times the mass of A so A is 25% and B is 75% of the total mass of the system. Space them apart by a distance of 100 units. Measure and calculate the force of attraction and it should match what you calculated. So now we introduce object C. We can repeat this for masses of C at 25%, 50%, and 75%. ( ie if not clear , total system mass of 125,150, &175). Our concern is only with the predicted and observed force of attraction between objects A and B. Everything else are parameters basically. So now we introduce object D. Again repeat the experiment with variable masses and variable spaces between A and C and D and B. Record all predictions and observations with the greatest level possible scientific precision possibly because the changes are going to be tiny BUT MEASURABLE! Repeat as needed until we are on object Z or Zz or Zzz until a sufficient enough pool of data can be collected to eventually figure out how to turn G from a constant to a function and then into a variable constant that works well enough. I'll touch on this a bit later how it is that gravity can reach out from the center of our Milky Way and keep our solar system in orbit or how something like the great attractor can be pulling large posts from so far away. But for now I would like to talk about another experiment that I think might be able to help figure out gravity better. We can see motion and movement spawns energy. We move a magnetic field to create an electric energy or move an electric energy to create a magnetic field. In theory there could be a succession of motion inside multiple relative parent frames of reference that could cause an interesting phenomenon. If nested parent frame of reference each with different velocities and trajectories is true and we have a dimension of energy then all objects and the energy inside them moving through this field could be giving off something similar to a magnetic field which in turn is inside another frame that is moving and creating an electric field inside another frame of reference that again creates a magnetic field. The repulsive effect of the electromagnetic attraction is lost in the successive frames of references and we get a force of gravity that is an average of alternating magnetic and electric fields generated by the natural motion of our universe inside successive moving frames of reference. And it could be that both are true. We may have fields of gravity extending outwards in our spheres of influences caused by these successive movements of energy and at the same time see a resistance to acceleration happening. If dark energy is caused by the dissipating tensor mesh strength of success parent frames of reference then not just inside our universe is expanding but in the expanse outside our VLS there is expansion happening there as well. Inside that parent frame of reference there is also expansion happening because every scale tries to hold onto its space time but its parents are all slowly fighting a loosing battle. So what would all this expansion of the expanse outside our visible universe have the effect on our universe of looking like? It would be appearing to try to push it away further and faster and so it would it be causing an acceleration of our Post and then inside our Post we would see a resistance to that acceleration as gravity. Maybe we have a specific gravitational constant because its related to the average rate that we are being accelerated at. One of Einstein's equivalence principles I think defines this fairly well and is a very interesting conundrum. How the effect an object has on everything else is the same as the amount of force needed to move it. Leads to an interpolation that they must be related in some way and then seeing the equation for the formula for electrostatic attraction so closely matching gravity there would appear to be a fairly straight forward way to quantize gravity once we better understand how it works as an aggregate. So let me pass on another potential experiment that if someday someone with time and money and resources wants to try it out I feel it may provide a way to help visualize the function of gravity better and see how the tensor mesh of spacetime might be spawned from the spheres of influences of both magnetic and non-magnetic materials alike. I don’t have all the exact logistics but I am sure the team that decides to tackle this challenge will fill in the gaps. 6 hard rubberized bars 3 at 2 meter length and 3 at a length of 5 meters. Intersected at 45 degree angles as if 2 sets of 3 right angles were joined askew. It would create a scalene dodecahedron. At the end of each pad we need a very sturdy and sensitive gravimeters and as many different types of sensitive EMF probes as exist. A baseline reading would confirm all baseline EMF and gravitational readings. This dodecahedron shaped measurement system itself will be placed inside a large hard rubberized sphere maybe 15 meters in diameter and attached at 90 degree arc segments from the center would be 6 strong dynamos. Not sure of the specifics but some type of self-induction current generating system with whatever it takes to generate strong magnetic fields of varying strengths. We can take baseline measurements from all 12 recording pads and confirm the aggregate field strengths change as each dynamo is activated. In theory the math should be able to predict the field strength measurements at each pad which would be verified as you activate each dynamo. Once we are certain we have good baseline readings then we can turn off the dynamos and start spinning the sphere. We increase the speed 10 times. Each time we increase the speed we turn the dynamos on one at a time 90 seconds apart while recording all the measurements to compare for changes from the baseline. Then we test spinning our sensor array perpendicular to the rotation of the sphere and repeat the steps done so far for 10 different increasing speeds. The second to last set of tests would be to start also turning the sphere perpendicular to its present horizontal motion. So the cage that the entire project is built would then start spinning on its axis and we repeat all tests done so far. The last test is then to move this cage in an orbit. Maybe 300 meter radius. Repeat all tests at 10 different increasing velocities. The rate of acceleration between each velocity test at each point should be steady so 60 seconds of increasing velocity followed by 60 seconds of steady velocity. I predict a 70- 80 percent chance that the observations from this fairly simple machine would give us new math to work with to gauge the impact of known velocities on the observed changes in field strengths. From this we can than extrapolate backwards into our estimated approximate relative velocity and rotational spin. If by chance the math does not give us a way to unite electromagnetism and gravity then one last set of tests might and that would be to repeat the experiment at a scale factor of two and again at a scale factor of 5. If we can put a small percent of the of money we spend on particle colliders towards this experiment it would explain gravity and unequivocally confirm we exist inside a succession of nested frames of references. So this may help figure out the math behind gravity and maybe even how to quantize it or we may not be able to produce a reliable scenario because of how difficult it is to block out the Earth's gravity. This experiment conducted in space, as far from external gravity sources as possible might be needed but hopefully with a baseline that includes the Earth's gravity and very finely tuned instruments with very good precision I predict we may find something. But that does not really explain how gravity works. According to Einstein's theory of general relativity mass warps space time and causes a curvature of space. One reason for this approach was because we had yet to find the aether and unable to explain how gravity could cause the bending of light waves. The only way to really explain the bending of light waves would be if space and time were bending. And the tensor mesh of space time is just that. It is the aggregate collection of all the bending and curving of spacetime inside our Post. Our local post, our solar system sees the strongest tensor mesh from the collection of all the bending and curving of space time of from our sun and the planets. But how and why does gravity bend space and time. I think the answer lies in the fact speed can dilate time and gravity can dilate time. The fact that both can dilate time means there needs to be a relation somewhere. So if time dilation occurs because the speed causes "time" to move through more space in a shorter period of time then gravitational time dilation means that gravity causes time to move through more space in a shorter period of time and that would make sense if the tensor mesh of gravitational attraction and spheres of influence caused by gravitational attraction were displacements from equilibrium and the amplitude of the gravitational wave expressed the strength or intensity of the attraction then time inside the areas of the strongest gravitational attraction would see the most movement of spacetime oscillating away from the equilibrium state and causing a longer path through space time thus gravitational time dilation. So then gravity is an aggregation of lots of little electrostatic tugs but we know that gravity moves at the speed of light so we have a succession of little tugs moving through the quantum foam with each movement and oscillation touching the foam next to it. Next to a heavy object or any object the area closest to the object has the greatest amount of electrostatic attraction between the foam that makes up the object and the space around it. So the first nanometer of the sphere of influence of gravity around an object causes a disturbance in space time and the strength of the disturbance correlates to the amplitude of the gravitational wave that starts. Each piece of foam is displaced by the piece of foam next to it as the wave oscillated. If an object was all by itself then it would emanate gravitational waves but not feel any tug against them If there was no medium for gravitational waves to travel on then objects would run out of energy. It takes energy to start the wave and the energy converts from amplitude to diameter of the sphere of influence as waves carry energy away and if gravitational attraction worked without mechanical waves then gravity would run out but objects do not run out of gravity. That to me seems like a clear reason to expect a medium is transferring the energy and thus the source need not exhaust energy or release energy for the gravitational waves to have their impact. So all these spheres of influence sending out waves of gravity and sometimes intercepting other waves from other objects. Its is the intersection of all the different points where the sphere of influence cross each other that have multiple scenarios. Some waves will cancel each other out, some waves will pass right through each other, and some waves may distort the path of another wave and cause an interference pattern. I predict someday we will find the core nuance the makes gravity and strong force and weak force and electromagnetism all behave differently is how those interference patterns behave. The greater the interference caused the more displacements from equilibrium that would ripple at the points where out of phase or out of wavelength waves could have part of a crest ride down another wave's trough. The repulsion caused by the waves mixing could then pull or tug on the source wave or ripple back against the source and either way put tug or pull on the source object. If not directly due to the interference pattern then the mass energy time density which may also be a mass energy speed density could then determine how forces are as strong as the strong force or as weak as gravity. But I see every point of intersection pulls or tugs just a bit on the quantum foam at the point of intersection. That electrostatic attraction at every point of intersection causes each piece of foam near the point of intersection to kind of feel a little recoil. A pull or tug on it and so it tugs on the next piece of quantum foam next to it and that continues down the entire length of gravitational wave bringing a reciprocal attraction all the way back to the source object. So two objects and maybe millions of different intersecting points each then causing a little bit of tug back to the source and add in many different objects and each object then sees the gravitational attraction of all the others. So that would explain part of gravity but what about an object's resistance to the acceleration happening on our universe. What is causing that? Again its the quantum foam. As each object is moving through spacetime the electrostatic attraction between the foam inside the object and the foam outside the object causes a resistance. If an electrostatic charge happening at the quantum foam level was how gravity extended outwards and also how gravity is a resistance to acceleration and we see how the quantum foam could be responsible for both observations. That would back up the equivalence principle that Einstein had pointed out. One last point. The formula for electrostatic attraction (or repulsion) is nearly identical to the formula for gravity but uses a different constant. As it relates to what I called a type of recoil tug back across the quantum foam there may be another way to visualize this. Every EM wave produces oscillating electric fields and magnetic fields. Between every crest and trough we have small magnetic fields so when I talk about how different types of waves can have different interference patterns and thus different strengths of attraction or repulsion it could be the magnetic fields associated with the EM radiation that carries gravity that provides the recoil/tugback. Each localized areas of spacetime inside the quantum foam that the EM wave is riding on could be exposed to magnetic fields and that attraction of the millions of separate intersecting points of two spheres of influence is felt along the magnetic field side of the waves. The Mysteries Of Gravity #Gravity
#thenaturalstateofnature
All the darkness in the entire vast multiverse can not defeat the flame of a single candle.
|